But with a site like non.io there's no reason for me _not_ to post my content there. As it stands I don't make any money on this, I just do it for fun. Take me for example, I write tech articles from time to time, and the occasional video, presentation, or coding live stream. The business model itself is what makes thin interesting, not to users, but to creators. Getting $10 would need into the thousands of votes (which rarely happens on Reddit comments by comparison) and still wouldn't pay for my time wtiting it by minimum wage. Getting $0.03 for it is more like tipping a waitress a penny, I think. Getting nothing for it is fine, that was the deal. There are times I've spent well over an hour writing programming comments on Reddit, testing code or trying to explain a concept, things that could have been a blog post. I'm not clear if that covers comments or only top level submissions / posts, but if I comment and get upvoted ten times in a month, presumably I get some money from the upvoters, like $0.03. So if I subscribe and pay $2/month, there's $1/month from me for that, so if I upvote ten things they each get $0.03 from me and if I upvote a ten things a day that's three hundred in a month, they each get $0.0033 from me. > " gets split evenly between everything you upvote that month." Sorry if that's a little harsh, but I mean well! Good luck! What you have now is a tech demo, not a platform. Consider the user experience when I visit or or any other link aggregation competitor. even as a fellow developer, my first instinct is to abandon the page as soon as I'm greeted with the cliche startup marketing page. When I visit the root domain I shouldn't be greeted with a marketing splash page, you need interesting content in the user's face right away, entice their curiosity and drive the user to explore the site. Add in the upfront subscription model and failure to launch is basically assured. If you want to browse the code or the api:Ĭongrats on the hard work, and the idea is fine, but the problem is that tech like this is a cheap commodity in a massively oversaturated space, and without a hook that makes the platform exceptional (innovative/clever/beautiful design, unique aggregation features, inherently interesting content, reimagined user/content/moderation dynamics etc etc), this kind of thing is dead in the water because it lacks a network effect. If you want to try a test account, use this login: I've opened up free accounts to post and interact in the meantime. I'm still testing the distribution algorithm for returning funds - you won't get overcharged or anything, but I just want to guarantee your funds are properly distributed at the end of the month. Fundamentally I feel like any ad-supported network doesn't have alignment between the needs of the users and the needs of the platform, which is what drove me to make this.īecause this is a soft launch, if you do subscribe I'd encourage you not to pay for the time being. It's a simple model, but I hope it's a better one than the freemium model we've been relying on for the last few years. I take $1 to run the servers, everything left gets split evenly between everything you upvote that month. Minimum subscription is $2 (though you can choose more). Doing a (very) soft launch today, mainly because I want to use it to encourage discussion of alternatives.Ģ. Heya HN, I've been working on a reddit-like platform as my primary side project for the last few years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |